our previous investigations have highlighted several challenges and limitations: Gdels Incompleteness Theorems : The framework may be subject to the limitations of formal systems. Russells Paradox : Potential for paradoxical constructs in set formation. Cognitive Limitations : Human cognitive space may have inherent limits affecting the understanding and proof of complex problems. Paradox of the DIKWP Cognitive Semantic Space : If all explanations exist within the cognitive semantic space，...， 30(3)， and establishing a Meta-Semantic Layer， l_2， the updated DIKWP Semantic Mathematics aims to provide a more robust and comprehensive approach to modeling natural language semantics and human cognition. 1. Introduction The original DIKWP Semantic Mathematics framework is based on the manipulation of three fundamental semantics: Sameness (Data) Difference (Information) Completeness (Knowledge) This framework aims to model all natural language semantics by iteratively applying these semantics. However，l2。

p 2 ， Difference， Limitation Semantics， D. J. (1990). Why Fodor and Pylyshyn Were Wrong: The Simplest Refutation. Department of Philosophy， Semantic Mathematics， Enhanced Framework， please contact [Authors Name] at [Contact Information].